In New York, a recent court decision has significantly changed dog bite laws, making it easier for victims to sue dog owners for negligence even if the dog has no prior history of aggression.
This ruling, in Flanders v. Goodfellow, eliminates the “one-bite rule” that previously required proof of a dog’s vicious propensities and the owner’s awareness of them for liability. Here’s a breakdown of the changes:
- From “One Bite” to Negligence:
Previously, New York law required victims to prove a dog had “vicious propensities” and the owner knew about them. Now, victims can sue based on the owner’s negligence in handling or supervising the dog. - Focus on Owner’s Actions:
The focus shifts from the dog’s history to the owner’s actions. Courts can now consider factors like whether the dog was properly leashed or contained. - Compensation for Injuries:
Victims can seek compensation for medical expenses, pain and suffering, lost income, and other damages.
This change aligns New York with most other states, which allow negligence claims in dog bite cases. It provides greater protection for victims and places a greater emphasis on responsible pet ownership.
If you or anyone you know has been injured in an accident or a been a victim of a dog bite, don’t hesitate to contact us for a free consultation. We’re here to ensure your rights are protected every step of the way.
